Monday, May 1, 2017

The Global Warming Fraud: Carbon Dioxide "Pollutant" Myth Totally Debunked In Must-See Science Video

With so much attention being focused over the last while on the situation in North Korea, little attention has been paid to how our criminal governments, and especially the one here in Canada, are pushing forward with their want to impose a new fraud "tax" on their citizens called a "Carbon Tax"... This fraud is of course based upon the LIE that somehow Carbon Dioxide is a "Greenhouse Gas" and the lie that this tax has to be imposed on everyone to try to curb "Carbon Emissions"... The fact is again that this is a tax to fleece the people out of their hard earned money based on nothing short of a massive lie and swindle...

I came across a most important article and video that I definitely want to share with my own readers here... It comes from Mike Adams, the so called "Health Ranger" over at his site, "Natural News" at www.naturalnews.com, and is entitled: "Carbon Dioxide "Pollutant" Myth Totally DEBUNKED In Must-See Science Video" and I have that article and of course the accompanying video right here for everyone to see for themselves.....I have my own thoughts and comments to follow:


Carbon dioxide “pollutant” myth totally DEBUNKED in must-see science video

Tags: Image: Carbon dioxide “pollutant” myth totally DEBUNKED in must-see science video


(Natural News) As part of the new Health Ranger Science effort at public education on crucial science issues of our time, I’ve just released this truly must-see video that totally debunks the false narrative of carbon dioxide as a “pollutant.”

As you’ll see explained in the video below, climate change alarmists use visual trickery and deceit to make gullible people falsely believe that CO2 is rising to unprecedented, alarming levels across our planet. In truth, CO2 is at nearly the lowest point ever recorded in the history of the planet.

In fact, using data from the NOAA and even the IPCC, it turns out that CO2 levels were as much as 15 times higher than 400 ppm in the past, and plants across the planet today are starving for CO2, the “molecule of life” for plant life across the planet (including forests, food crops and jungles).

While climate change alarmists absurdly claim CO2 is a pollutant, they neglect to tell you that without CO2, we would all die of starvation because every ecosystem on the planet would almost instantly collapse. If CO2 were dropped to zero, Earth would become a barren global desert of death entirely incapable of supporting human life at all.

Even more shockingly, most climate change cultists still have no idea that their own bodies are made of carbon, and even the THC found in all the weed they’re smoking contains 21 carbon elements per molecule (C21H30O2). Vegetarians and vegans apparently don’t realize that all the fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds they eat are also made of carbon, as is their own blood, skin, hormones and tissues. At the same time these people are denouncing carbon as an “evil pollutant,” they are eating carbon, drinking carbon, smoking carbon and even making babies made of carbon.

Watch (and share) my full carbon dioxide science presentation below, and help educate the ignorant masses about the truth on carbon dioxide. Also read Climate Depot to learn more on this topic.




NTS Notes:  I remember just a short while ago when someone did bring me some of these so called 'charts' and "figures" that the liars that promote this "Global Warming" lie have been using incessantly to push their bullshit... And I too did notice the peculiar thing that the so called charts all showed a very narrow range of x-y coordinates and basically only focused in on a very small range of figures and dates.....

Yes, the Earth's atmosphere is presently almost starved of CO2 that plant life desperately needs for its own survival and for the generation of waste O2 that we consume for our metabolic processes... And yes, in the distant past this planet did absolutely have a massive amount of CO2 in its atmosphere, only to see that CO2 abundance disappear with the changing atmospheric makeup of this planet.....

I for one have always been so disgusted by all of these clowns pushing this "Global Warming" bullshit and especially the lie that CO2 is a "Greenhouse Gas"... CO2 in itself is not molecularly prone to create the "Greenhouse Gas" effect that other chemicals such as CH4 (Methane) or H20 (Water vapour) do in our atmosphere..... And even fewer people remember the time when CO2 was used extensively for cooling systems (Dry Ice)...... In fact CO2 does promote cooling of our atmosphere and NOT this bullshit of heating!

The only reason why CO2 and this fraud "Carbon Tax" is being promoted is because CO2 is the byproduct of emissions and any burning and the products that generate CO2 are viable for taxation.. And of course the general public will swallow this bullshit that we need a "Carbon Tax" to "save the planet" without understanding the science behind CO2... The result will be more tax money to fill our crooked governments' coffers....

The reality is that we need Carbon Dioxide for our very survival on this planet, and as far as I am concerned there should be NO cutting back of Carbon emissions what so ever for the plant life on this planet depends on it...

More to come

NTS

2 comments:

Adrian Chetwynd said...

“96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made”
4% of 380ppm = about 15ppm...Hasn’t CO2 risen (allegedly) by more than 15ppm over the past few years anyway? If so, then even if we stopped using fossil fuels completely it would have been a waste of time (even if it actually was a good thing to do).
Source article (most sources claim less than 4%)
Marc Morano - Climate DepotJune 10, 2013 4:33 PM
Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby, Professor and Climate Chair at Macquarie University, Australia explains in a recent, highly-recommended lecture presented at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, why man-made CO2 is not the driver of atmospheric CO2 or climate change. Dr. Salby demonstrates:
CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
The IPCC claim that “All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity” is impossible
“Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels”
Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable – CO2 – and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
Climate models have no predictive value

Adrian Chetwynd said...

“96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made”
4% of 380ppm = about 15ppm...Hasn’t CO2 risen (allegedly) by more than 15ppm over the past few years anyway? If so, then even if we stopped using fossil fuels completely it would have been a waste of time (even if it actually was a good thing to do).
Source article (most sources claim less than 4%)
Marc Morano - Climate DepotJune 10, 2013 4:33 PM
Climate scientist Dr. Murry Salby, Professor and Climate Chair at Macquarie University, Australia explains in a recent, highly-recommended lecture presented at Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg, Germany, why man-made CO2 is not the driver of atmospheric CO2 or climate change. Dr. Salby demonstrates:
CO2 lags temperature on both short [~1-2 year] and long [~1000 year] time scales
The IPCC claim that “All of the increases [in CO2 concentrations since pre-industrial times] are caused by human activity” is impossible
“Man-made emissions of CO2 are clearly not the source of atmospheric CO2 levels”
Satellite observations show the highest levels of CO2 are present over non-industrialized regions, e.g. the Amazon, not over industrialized regions
96% of CO2 emissions are from natural sources, only 4% is man-made
Net global emissions from all sources correlate almost perfectly with short-term temperature changes [R2=.93] rather than man-made emissions
Methane levels are also controlled by temperature, not man-made emissions
Climate model predictions track only a single independent variable – CO2 – and disregard all the other, much more important independent variables including clouds and water vapor.
The 1% of the global energy budget controlled by CO2 cannot wag the other 99%
Climate models have been falsified by observations over the past 15+ years
Climate models have no predictive value